Flynn > Rodgers?

I like Matt Flynn. NCAA title, brings a little energy...I think he can have a nice career as a solid NFL backup. Jim Sorgi, if you will. That said, this is pretty ridiculous. Actually, really ridiculous (yahoo sports):

Some evaluators are even convinced backup Matt Flynn has as a brighter future than Rodgers, having shown great ball placement in the preseason and much better escapability, which is more valued behind a line playing as poorly as the Packers’. If Rodgers should go down, as he has had a tendency to do early in his career, it could be a blessing in disguise.

A blessing in disguise? I'm not saying Rodgers is on Peyton Manning's level, but come on??